1887

Abstract

Based on complete bacterial genome sequence data, we demonstrate a correlation between bacterial chromosome length and the G+C content of the genome, with longer genomes having higher G+C contents. The correlation value decreases at shorter genome sizes, where there is a wider spread of G+C values. However, although significant (P<0.001), the correlation value (Pearson R=0.58) suggests that other factors also have a significant influence. A similar pattern was seen for plasmids; longer plasmids had higher G+C values, although the large number of shorter plasmids had a wide spread of G+C values. There was also a significant (P<0.0001) correlation between the G+C content of plasmids and the G+C content of their bacterial host. Conversely, the G+C content of bacteriophages tended to reduce with larger genome sizes, and although there was a correlation between host genome G+C content and that of the bacteriophage, it was not as strong as that seen between plasmids and their hosts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000168
2018-04-10
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/4/4/mgen000168.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000168&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Brocchieri L. The GC content of bacterial genomes. J Phylogen Evolution Biol 2014; 2:e108 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Freese E. On the evolution of the base composition of DNA. J Theor Biol 1962; 3:82–101 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Sueoka N. On the genetic basis of variation and heterogeneity of DNA base composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1962; 48:582–592 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Mitchell A, Graur D. Inferring the pattern of spontaneous mutation from the pattern of substitution in unitary pseudogenes of Mycobacterium leprae and a comparison of mutation patterns among distantly related organisms. J Mol Evol 2005; 61:795–803 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Sargentini NJ, Smith KC. DNA sequence analysis of γ-radiation (anoxic)-induced and spontaneous lacId mutations in Escherichia coli K-12. Mutat Res 1994; 309:147–163 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hershberg R, Petrov DA. Evidence of selection upon genomic GC-content in bacteria. PLoS Genetics 2010; 7:e49060
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Foerstner KU, von Mering C, Hooper SD, Bork P. Environments shape the nucleotide composition of genomes. EMBO Rep 2005; 6:1208–1213 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. McEwan CE, Gatherer D, McEwan NR. Nitrogen-fixing aerobic bacteria have higher genomic GC content than non-fixing species within the same genus. Hereditas 1998; 128:173–178 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Naya H, Romero H, Zavala A, Alvarez B, Musto H. Aerobiosis increases the genomic guanine plus cytosine content (GC%) in prokaryotes. J Mol Evol 2002; 55:260–264 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Musto H, Naya H, Zavala A, Romero H, Alvarez-Valín F et al. Correlations between genomic GC levels and optimal growth temperatures in prokaryotes. FEBS Lett 2004; 573:73–77 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Musto H, Naya H, Zavala A, Romero H, Alvarez-Valín F et al. Genomic GC level, optimal growth temperature, and genome size in prokaryotes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006; 347:1–3 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bohlin J, Skjerve E, Ussery DW. Investigations of oligonucleotide usage variance within and between prokaryotes. PLoS Comput Biol 2008; 4:e1000057 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bohlin J, Sekse C, Skjerve E, Brynildsrud O. Positive correlations between genomic %AT and genome size within strains of bacterial species: correlation between microbial genome size and % AT. Environ Microbiol Rep 2014; 6:278–286
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Guo FB, Lin H, Huang J. A plot of G + C content against sequence length of 640 bacterial chromosomes shows the points are widely scattered in the upper triangular area. Chromosome Res 2009; 17:359–364 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mitchell D. GC content and genome length in Chargaff compliant genomes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2007; 353:207–210 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Schwartz DC, Cantor CR. Separation of yeast chromosome-sized DNAs by pulsed field gradient gel electrophoresis. Cell 1984; 37:67–75 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 1980; 48:817–838 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hunter JD. Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng 2007; 9:90–95 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Angov E. Codon usage: nature's roadmap to expression and folding of proteins. Biotechnol J 2011; 6:650–659 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Timinskas K, Balvočiūtė M, Timinskas A, Venclovas Č. Comprehensive analysis of DNA polymerase III α subunits and their homologs in bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:1393–1413 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Belda E, van Heck RG, José Lopez-Sanchez M, Cruveiller S, Barbe V et al. The revisited genome of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 enlightens its value as a robust metabolic chassis . Environ Microbiol 2016; 18:3403–3424 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Campbell A, Mrázek J, Karlin S. Genome signature comparisons among prokaryote, plasmid, and mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96:9184–9189 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rocha EP, Danchin A. Base composition bias might result from competition for metabolic resources. Trends Genet 2002; 18:291–294 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Forsdyke DR. Different biological species "broadcast" their DNAs at different (G+C)% "wavelengths". J Theor Biol 1996; 178:405–417 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Agashe D, Shankar N. The evolution of bacterial DNA base composition. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 2014; 322:517–528 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Bohlin J, Snipen L, Hardy SP, Kristoffersen AB, Lagesen K et al. Analysis of intra-genomic GC content homogeneity within prokaryotes. BMC Genomics 2010; 11:464 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000168
Loading
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000168
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error