1887

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance reservoirs within food-producing animals are thought to be a risk to animal and human health. This study describes the minimum natural resistome of pig faeces as the bacteria are under no direct antibiotic selective pressure. The faecal resistome of 257 different genes comprised 56 core and 201 accessory resistance genes. The genes present at the highest relative abundances across all samples were tetW, tetQ, tet44, tet37, tet40, mefA, aadE, ant(9)−1, ermB and cfxA2. This study characterized the baseline resistome, the microbiome composition and the metabolic components described by the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways in healthy pig faeces, without antibiotic selective pressures. The microbiome hierarchical analysis resulted in a cluster tree with a highly similar pattern to that of the accessory resistome cluster tree. Functional capacity profiling identified genes associated with horizontal gene transfer. We identified a statistically significant positive correlation between the total antibiotic resistome and suggested indicator genes, which agree with using these genes as indicators of the total resistomes. The correlation between total resistome and total microbiome in this study was positive and statistically significant. Therefore, the microbiome composition influenced the resistome composition. This study identified a core and accessory resistome present in a cohort of healthy pigs, in the same conditions without antibiotics. It highlights the presence of antibiotic resistance in the absence of antibiotic selective pressure and the variability between animals even under the same housing, food and living conditions. Antibiotic resistance will remain in the healthy pig gut even when antibiotics are not used. Therefore, the risk of antibiotic resistance transfer from animal faeces to human pathogens or the environment will remain in the absence of antibiotics.

  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000272
2019-05-15
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/5/5/mgen000272.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000272&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Thanner S, Drissner D, Walsh F. Antimicrobial resistance in agriculture. mBio 2016; 7:e02227–15 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Martin MJ, Thottathil SE, Newman TB. Antibiotics overuse in animal agriculture: a call to action for health care providers. Am J Public Health 2015; 105:2409–2410 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. De Briyne N, Atkinson J, Pokludová L, Borriello SP. Antibiotics used most commonly to treat animals in Europe. Vet Rec 2014; 175:325 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Binh CTT, Heuer H, Kaupenjohann M, Smalla K. Piggery manure used for soil fertilization is a reservoir for transferable antibiotic resistance plasmids. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2008; 66:25–37 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jechalke S, Kopmann C, Rosendahl I, Groeneweg J, Weichelt V et al. Increased abundance and transferability of resistance genes after field application of manure from sulfadiazine-treated pigs. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013; 79:1704–1711 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Looft T, Johnson TA, Allen HK, Bayles DO, Alt DP et al. In-feed antibiotic effects on the swine intestinal microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109:1691–1696 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Madec J-Y, Haenni M. Antimicrobial resistance plasmid reservoir in food and food-producing animals. Plasmid 2018; 99:72–81 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ma L, Xia Y, Li B, Yang Y, Li L-G et al. Metagenomic assembly reveals hosts of antibiotic resistance genes and the shared resistome in pig, chicken, and human feces. Environ Sci Technol 2016; 50:420–427 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Munk P, Andersen VD, de Knegt L, Jensen MS, Knudsen BE et al. A sampling and metagenomic sequencing-based methodology for monitoring antimicrobial resistance in swine herds. J Antimicrob Chemother 2017; 72:385–392 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Thomas M, Webb M, Ghimire S, Blair A, Olson K et al. Metagenomic characterization of the effect of feed additives on the gut microbiome and antibiotic resistome of feedlot cattle. Sci Rep 2017; 7:12257 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Xiao L, Estellé J, Kiilerich P et al. A reference gene Catalogue of the pig gut microbiome. Nat Microbiol 2016; 19:16161
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Berendonk TU, Manaia CM, Merlin C, Fatta-Kassinos D, Cytryn E et al. Tackling antibiotic resistance: the environmental framework. Nat Rev Microbiol 2015; 13:310–317 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Forsberg KJ, Patel S, Gibson MK, Lauber CL, Knight R et al. Bacterial phylogeny structures soil resistomes across habitats. Nature 2014; 509:612–616 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fitzpatrick D, Walsh F. Antibiotic resistance genes across a wide variety of metagenomes. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 2016; 92:fiv168 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. McArthur AG, Tsang KK. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in the genomic age. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2017; 1388:78–91 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. The Human Microbiome Project Consortium A framework for human microbiome research. Nature 2012; 486:215–221 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Bengtsson-Palme J. The diversity of uncharacterized antibiotic resistance genes can be predicted from known gene variants-but not always. Microbiome 2018; 6:125 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J 2011; 17:10–12 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Mitchell AL, Scheremetjew M, Denise H, Potter S, Tarkowska A et al. EBI Metagenomics in 2017: enriching the analysis of microbial communities, from sequence reads to assemblies. Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46:D726–D735 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Yang Y, Jiang X, Chai B, Ma L, Li B et al. ARGs-OAP: online analysis pipeline for antibiotic resistance genes detection from metagenomic data using an integrated structured ARG-database. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:2346–2351 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Yin X, Jiang X-T, Chai B, Li L, Yang Y et al. ARGs-OAP v2.0 with an expanded SARG database and hidden Markov models for enhancement characterization and quantification of antibiotic resistance genes in environmental metagenomes. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:2263–2270 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than blast. Bioinformatics 2010; 26:2460–2461 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kuilman T, Velds A, Kemper K, Ranzani M, Bombardelli L et al. CopywriteR: DNA copy number detection from off-target sequence data. Genome Biol 2015; 16:49 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Øyvind H, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. Past: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 2001; 4:9
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Zakrzewski M, Proietti C, Ellis JJ, Hasan S, Brion M-J et al. CALYPSO: a user-friendly web-server for mining and visualizing microbiome-environment interactions. Bioinformatics 2017; 33:782–783 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Munk P, Knudsen BE, Lukjancenko O, Duarte ASR, Van Gompel L et al. Abundance and diversity of the faecal resistome in slaughter pigs and broilers in nine European countries. Nat Microbiol 2018; 3:898–908 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 1967; 27:209–220
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mantel N, Valand RS. A technique of nonparametric multivariate analysis. Biometrics 1970; 26:547–558 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Auffret MD, Dewhurst RJ, Duthie C-A, Rooke JA, John Wallace R et al. The rumen microbiome as a reservoir of antimicrobial resistance and pathogenicity genes is directly affected by diet in beef cattle. Microbiome 2017; 5:159 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Møller HD, Parsons L, Jørgensen TS, Botstein D, Regenberg B et al. Extrachromosomal circular DNA is common in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015; 112:E3114–E3122 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sun J, Huang T, Chen C et al. Comparison of fecal microbial composition and antibiotic resistance genes from swine, farm workers and the surrounding villagers. Sci Rep 2017; 10:4965
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Feng J, Li B, Jiang X, Yang Y, Wells GF et al. Antibiotic resistome in a large-scale healthy human gut microbiota deciphered by metagenomic and network analyses. Environ Microbiol 2018; 20:355–368 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Luby E, Ibekwe AM, Zilles J, Pruden A. Molecular methods for assessment of antibiotic resistance in agricultural ecosystems: prospects and challenges. J Environ Qual 2016; 45:441–453 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Spencer SJ, Tamminen MV, Preheim SP, Guo MT, Briggs AW et al. Massively parallel sequencing of single cells by epicPCR links functional genes with phylogenetic markers. ISME J 2016; 10:427–436 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000272
Loading
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000272
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Supplementary material 1

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error