1887

Abstract

is the leading cause of bacterial gastroenteritis worldwide, but, unlike other foodborne pathogens, is not commonly reported as causing outbreaks. The population structure of the species is characterized by a high degree of genetic diversity, but the presence of stable clonally derived genotypes persisting in space and time, and potentially leading to diffuse outbreaks, has recently been identified. The spread of these recurring genotypes could be enhanced by wild birds, suspected to act as vectors for a wide range of microorganisms that can be transmissible to other animals or humans. This study assessed the genetic diversity of carriage in wild birds and surface waters to explore a potential link between these environments and the persistence over years of recurring lineages infecting humans in Luxembourg. These lineages corresponded to over 40 % of clinical isolates over a 4 year period from 2018 to 2021. While mainly exotic genotypes were recovered from environmental samples, 4 % of from wild birds corresponded to human recurring genotypes. Among them, a human clinical endemic lineage, occurring for over a decade in Luxembourg, was detected in one bird species, suggesting a possible contribution to the persistence of this clone and its multi-host feature. Whereas 27 % of wild birds were carriers of confirming their role as spreader or reservoir, only three out of 59 genotypes overlapped with recurring human strains. While direct transmission of infection through wild birds remains questionable, they may play a key role in the environmental spreading of stable clones to livestock, and this issue merits further investigation.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Research Fund Luxembourg (FNR) (Award 11684203)
    • Principle Award Recipient: CatherineRagimbeau
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001031
2023-06-05
2024-05-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/mgen/9/6/mgen001031.html?itemId=/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001031&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. European Food Safety AuthorityEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control The European Union One Health 2020 Zoonoses Report. EFSA J 2021; 19:e06971 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Pogreba-Brown K, Austhof E, Armstrong A, Schaefer K, Villa Zapata L et al. Chronic gastrointestinal and joint-related sequelae associated with common foodborne illnesses: a scoping review. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2020; 17:67–86 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. European Food Safety AuthorityEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control The European Union One Health 2019 Zoonoses Report. EFSA J 2021; 19:e06406 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Nennig M, Llarena A-K, Herold M, Mossong J, Penny C et al. Investigating major recurring Campylobacter jejuni lineages in Luxembourg using four core or whole genome sequencing typing schemes. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2020; 10:608020 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mughini-Gras L, Pijnacker R, Coipan C, Mulder AC, Fernandes Veludo A et al. Sources and transmission routes of campylobacteriosis: a combined analysis of genome and exposure data. J Infect 2021; 82:216–226 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ellis-Iversen J, Ridley A, Morris V, Sowa A, Harris J et al. Persistent environmental reservoirs on farms as risk factors for Campylobacter in commercial poultry. Epidemiol Infect 2012; 140:916–924 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sheppard SK. Campylobacter Ecology and Evolution | Book 2014 pp 265–284
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tsiodras S, Kelesidis T, Kelesidis I, Bauchinger U, Falagas ME. Human infections associated with wild birds. J Infect 2008; 56:83–98 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Craven SE, Stern NJ, Line E, Bailey JS, Cox NA et al. Determination of the incidence of Salmonella spp., Campylobacter jejuni, and Clostridium perfringens in wild birds near broiler chicken houses by sampling intestinal droppings. Avian Dis 2000; 44:715–720 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Llarena A-K, Zhang J, Vehkala M, Välimäki N, Hakkinen M et al. Monomorphic genotypes within a generalist lineage of Campylobacter jejuni show signs of global dispersion. Microbial Genomics 2016; 2:10 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Smith OM, Snyder WE, Owen JP. Are we overestimating risk of enteric pathogen spillover from wild birds to humans?. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2020; 95:652–679 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Mughini-Gras L, Penny C, Ragimbeau C, Schets FM, Blaak H et al. Quantifying potential sources of surface water contamination with Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Water Res 2016; 101:36–45 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Mughini Gras L, Smid JH, Wagenaar JA, de Boer AG, Havelaar AH et al. Risk factors for campylobacteriosis of chicken, ruminant, and environmental origin: a combined case-control and source attribution analysis. PLoS One 2012; 7:e42599 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Mullner P, Spencer SEF, Wilson DJ, Jones G, Noble AD et al. Assigning the source of human campylobacteriosis in New Zealand: a comparative genetic and epidemiological approach. Infect Genet Evol 2009; 9:1311–1319 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mullner P, Jones G, Noble A, Spencer SEF, Hathaway S et al. Source attribution of food-borne zoonoses in New Zealand: a modified Hald model. Risk Anal 2009; 29:970–984 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Smid JH, Mughini Gras L, de Boer AG, French NP, Havelaar AH et al. Practicalities of using non-local or non-recent multilocus sequence typing data for source attribution in space and time of human campylobacteriosis. PLoS One 2013; 8:e55029 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Linton D, Lawson AJ, Owen RJ, Stanley J. PCR detection, identification to species level, and fingerprinting of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli direct from diarrheic samples. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35:2568–2572 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bessède E, Solecki O, Sifré E, Labadi L, Mégraud F. Identification of Campylobacter species and related organisms by matrix assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011; 17:1735–1739 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gorman R, Adley CC. An evaluation of five preservation techniques and conventional freezing temperatures of -20 degrees C and -85 degrees C for long-term preservation of Campylobacter jejuni. Lett Appl Microbiol 2004; 38:306–310 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jünemann S, Sedlazeck FJ, Prior K, Albersmeier A, John U et al. Updating benchtop sequencing performance comparison. Nat Biotechnol 2013; 31:294–296 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr Protoc Bioinforma 2020; 70:e102 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dingle KE, Colles FM, Wareing DR, Ure R, Fox AJ et al. Multilocus sequence typing system for Campylobacter jejuni. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39:14–23 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Jolley KA, Bray JE, Maiden MCJ. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res 2018; 3:124 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Simpson EH. Measurement of diversity. Nature 1949; 163:688 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Harrison LM, Balan KV, Hiett KL, Babu US. Current methodologies and future direction of Campylobacter isolation and detection from food matrices, clinical samples, and the agricultural environment. J Microbiol Methods 2022; 201:106562 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ahmed NA, Gulhan T. Campylobacter in wild birds: is it an animal and public health concern?. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:812591 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Casalino G, D’Amico F, Dinardo FR, Bozzo G, Napoletano V et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in wild birds from a wildlife rescue centre. Animals 2022; 12:20 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ramonaitė S, Novoslavskij A, Zakarienė G, Aksomaitienė J, Malakauskas M. High prevalence and genetic diversity of Campylobacter jejuni in wild crows and pigeons. Curr Microbiol 2015; 71:559–565 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mencía-Gutiérrez A, Martín-Maldonado B, Pastor-Tiburón N, Moraleda V, González F et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter from wild birds of prey in Spain. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2021; 79:101712 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Broman T, Palmgren H, Bergström S, Sellin M, Waldenström J et al. Campylobacter jejuni in black-headed gulls (Larus ridibundus): prevalence, genotypes, and influence on C. jejuni epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40:4594–4602 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Du J, Luo J, Huang J, Wang C, Li M et al. Emergence of genetic diversity and multi-drug resistant Campylobacter jejuni from wild birds in Beijing, China. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:2433 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hald B, Skov MN, Nielsen EM, Rahbek C, Madsen JJ et al. Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in wild birds on Danish livestock farms. Acta Vet Scand 2016; 58:11 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Perrat A, Branchu P, Decors A, Turci S, Bayon-Auboyer MH et al. Wild boars as reservoir of highly virulent clone of hybrid Shiga toxigenic and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli responsible for edema disease, France. Emerg Infect Dis 2022; 28:382–393 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Batista R, Saraiva M, Lopes T, Silveira L, Coelho A et al. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of pathogenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., and Campylobacter spp., in free-living birds in Mainland Portugal. IJERPH 2023; 20:223 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Casanovas L, de Simón M, Ferrer MD, Arqués J, Monzón G. Intestinal carriage of Campylobacters, Salmonellas, Yersinias and Listerias in pigeons in the city of Barcelona. J Appl Bacteriol 1995; 78:11–13 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Swifts | What Do Swifts Eat & How Do They Catch Food? - The RSPB. n.d https://www.rspb.org.uk/birds-and-wildlife/wildlife-guides/bird-a-z/swift/what-do-swifts-eat/ accessed 10 February 2023
  37. Hald B, Skovgård H, Pedersen K, Bunkenborg H. Influxed insects as vectors for Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in Danish broiler houses. Poult Sci 2008; 87:1428–1434 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Szott V, Friese A. Emission sources of Campylobacter from agricultural farms, impact on environmental contamination and intervention strategies. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2021; 431:103–125 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Royden A, Wedley A, Merga JY, Rushton S, Hald B et al. A role for flies (Diptera) in the transmission of Campylobacter to broilers?. Epidemiol Infect 2016; 144:3326–3334 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Cody AJ, McCarthy ND, Bray JE, Wimalarathna HML, Colles FM et al. Wild bird-associated Campylobacter jejuni isolates are a consistent source of human disease, in Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. Environ Microbiol Rep 2015; 7:782–788 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Nennig M, Clément A, Longueval E, Bernardi T, Ragimbeau C et al. Metaphenotypes associated with recurrent genomic lineages of Campylobacter jejuni responsible for human infections in Luxembourg. Front Microbiol 2022; 13:901192 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Blackburn C de W, McClure PJ. Campylobacter and Arcobacter. In Foodborne Pathog Hazards, Risk Anal Control Second Ed 2009 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. de Haan CPA, Kivistö R, Hakkinen M, Rautelin H, Hänninen ML. Decreasing trend of overlapping multilocus sequence types between human and chicken Campylobacter jejuni isolates over a decade in Finland. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010; 76:5228–5236 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Kovanen SM, Kivistö RI, Rossi M, Schott T, Kärkkäinen U-M et al. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and whole-genome MLST of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from human infections in three districts during a seasonal peak in Finland. J Clin Microbiol 2014; 52:4147–4154 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Di Giannatale E, Garofolo G, Alessiani A, Di Donato G, Candeloro L et al. Tracing back clinical Campylobacter jejuni in the Northwest of Italy and assessing their potential source. Front Microbiol 2016; 7: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Marotta F, Janowicz A, Di Marcantonio L, Ercole C, Di Donato G et al. Molecular characterization and antimicrobial susceptibility of C. jejuni isolates from Italian wild bird populations. Pathogens 2020; 9:304 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Inglis GD, Teixeira JS, Boras VF. Comparative prevalence and diversity of Campylobacter jejuni strains in water and human beings over a 1-year period in southwestern Alberta, Canada. Can J Microbiol 2021; 67:851–863 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Bell RL, Kase JA, Harrison LM, Balan KV, Babu U et al. The persistence of bacterial pathogens in surface water and its impact on global food safety. Pathogens 2021; 10:1–33 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Jolley KA, Maiden MCJ. BIGSdb: scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11:1–11 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Hänninen ML, Niskanen M, Korhonen L. Water as a reservoir for Campylobacter jejuni infection in cows studied by serotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 1998; 45:37–42 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. French NP, Midwinter A, Holland B, Collins-Emerson J, Pattison R et al. Molecular epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from wild-bird fecal material in children’s playgrounds. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009; 75:779–783 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Herold M, Hock L, Penny C, Walczak C, Djabi F et al. Metagenomic strain-typing combined with isolate sequencing provides increased resolution of the genetic diversity of Campylobacter jejuni carriage in wild birds. Microorganisms 2023; 11:12 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001031
Loading
/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.001031
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error